The tactical picture shows that Cerundolo, Juan Manuel and Raphael Collignon manage their tennis in distinctly different ways.
Current patterns show that Cerundolo, Juan Manuel has been emphasizing serve placement and court positioning. In contrast, Raphael Collignon tends to emphasize return pressure and forward movement.
The serving dynamic will likely shape much of the tactical flow. Both players have shown contrasting methods to pressure points, with Cerundolo, Juan Manuel preferring extended exchanges while Raphael Collignon often seeks quicker points.
Movement efficiency proves essential when considering how each player handles challenging moments. Critical elements include their strategic adjustments during changing conditions.
The competitive uncertainty centers on whether baseline power or court movement will prove more effective.
Considering tactical approaches, the match appears likely to unfold across several tactical shifts, with mental resilience potentially shaping the final outcome.
Note
The victory of Cerundolo, Juan Manuel: 2.85
The victory of Raphael Collignon: 1.37
Over the last matches Cerundolo, Juan Manuel holds wins - 3, losses - 2. Raphael Collignon on the other hand ends the latest games with wins - 5, losses - 0. Based on the games played we come to a conclusion that Raphael Collignon currently is in better form, unlike Cerundolo, Juan Manuel.
Cerundolo, Juan Manuel: Quentin Halys โ (Win 2:0), Martin Damm โ (Win 0:2), Luca Van Assche โ (Win 0:2), Christian Garin โ (Loss 2:0), Matteo Arnaldi โ (Loss 0:2).
Raphael Collignon: Tallon Griekspoor โ (Win 2:0), Titouan Droguet โ (Win 2:0), Alexander Shevchenko โ (Win 1:0), Geoffrey Blancaneaux โ (Win 2:0), Dino Prizmic โ (Win 2:0).Both contenders have moved to the final while beating worthy opponents on their way there. In tournaments as France, Bordeaux, Clay each event is extremely important which is why a great battle awaits us.
