Home Page News Predictions Matches Articles Education
Francesco Forti
00
days
00
hours
00
min
00
sec
-
-
Makk, Peter
1
1.45
X
-
2
2.55
1
1.45
X
-
2
2.55
Bet now
Francesco Forti
W
L
L
L
W
Challenger Cordenons
12.07.26
Francesco Forti
2–0
Pietro Pampanin
ATP Challenger Liege, Belgium Men Singles
07.07.26
Francesco Forti
1–2
Jack Loge
Challenger Milan
28.06.26
Francesco Forti
1–2
Fausto Tabacco
ATP Challenger Cattolica, Italy Men Singles
13.06.26
Roberto Carballes Baena
2–1
Francesco Forti
ATP Challenger Cattolica, Italy Men Singles
12.06.26
Francesco Forti
2–0
Andrea Guerrieri
Makk, Peter
W
L
W
L
W
Challenger Cordenons
12.07.26
Jesse Delaney
0–2
Peter Makk
Challenger Brasov
29.06.26
Dimitar Kuzmanov
2–1
Peter Makk
Challenger Brasov
28.06.26
Ramkumar Ramanathan
0–2
Peter Makk
ATP Challenger Targu Mures, Romania Men Singles
22.06.26
Felix Balshaw
2–0
Peter Makk
ATP Challenger Targu Mures, Romania Men Singles
21.06.26
Robert Guna
1–2
Peter Makk

Over the last matches Francesco Forti holds wins - 2, losses - 3. Makk, Peter on the other hand ends the latest games with wins - 3, losses - 2. Based on the games played we can assume that Makk, Peter currently is in better form, unlike Francesco Forti.

Francesco Forti: Pietro Pampanin – (Win 2:0), Jack Loge – (Loss 1:2), Fausto Tabacco – (Loss 1:2), Roberto Carballes Baena – (Loss 2:1), Andrea Guerrieri – (Win 2:0).

Makk, Peter: Jesse Delaney – (Win 0:2), Dimitar Kuzmanov – (Loss 2:1), Ramkumar Ramanathan – (Win 0:2), Felix Balshaw – (Loss 2:0), Robert Guna – (Win 1:2).

Bet now Francesco Forti — Makk, Peter
Francesco Forti
Italy, Cordenons, Clay
1
1.45
X
-
2
2.55
Bet amount
Makk, Peter
If the bet wins you get
0.00
Bet now
Quick phrases
Go Francesco Forti!✊
Francesco Forti is on fire!💪
Cheering for Makk, Peter all the way!📣
Go for it Makk, Peter!
You're losers Francesco Forti 😝
Makk, Peter sucks 🍭
The game's gonna be hot! 🔥
I'm rooting for Francesco Forti
I'm rooting for Makk, Peter
I'm looking forward to an exciting tiebreak
Share your opinion with quick phrases or pass authorization and write your own
Quick comment (without authorization)