Home Page News Predictions Matches Articles Education
Liam Draxl
Finished
1
2
Basilashvili, Nikoloz
Liam Draxl
W
L
W
W
L
ATP Shanghai
05.10.26
Hugo Gaston
0–2
Liam Draxl
ATP Challenger San Diego 2, USA, Men Singles
23.09.26
Henry Searle
2–1
Liam Draxl
ATP Challenger San Diego 2, USA, Men Singles
22.09.26
Jack Kennedy
0–2
Liam Draxl
Davis Cup
18.09.26
Liam Draxl
2–0
Arthur Rinderknech
ATP US Open
28.08.26
Liam Draxl
1–2
Tristan Schoolkate
Basilashvili, Nikoloz
W
L
W
W
W
ATP Shanghai
05.10.26
Andre Ilagan
1–2
Nikoloz Basilashvili
ATP Chengdu
28.09.26
Nikoloz Basilashvili
1–2
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
ATP Chengdu
27.09.26
Jenson Brooksby
0–2
Nikoloz Basilashvili
ATP Chengdu
25.09.26
Nikoloz Basilashvili
2–0
Botic Van De Zandschulp
ATP Chengdu
24.09.26
Miomir Kecmanovic
0–2
Nikoloz Basilashvili

Over the last matches Liam Draxl holds victories - 3, losses - 2. Basilashvili, Nikoloz on the other hand holds the following results from the latest games: victories - 4, losses - 1. Based on the games played a conclusion can be made that Basilashvili, Nikoloz at the moment is in better form, in comparison to Liam Draxl.

Liam Draxl: Hugo Gaston – (Win 0:2), Henry Searle – (Loss 2:1), Jack Kennedy – (Win 0:2), Arthur Rinderknech – (Win 2:0), Tristan Schoolkate – (Loss 1:2).

Basilashvili, Nikoloz: Andre Ilagan – (Win 1:2), Alejandro Davidovich Fokina – (Loss 1:2), Jenson Brooksby – (Win 0:2), Botic Van De Zandschulp – (Win 2:0), Miomir Kecmanovic – (Win 0:2).

Both opponents have moved to the qualification_round_2 while beating strong opponents along the way. In tournaments as China, Shanghai, Hard every match is meaningful which is why a great matchup awaits us.

Quick phrases
Go Liam Draxl!✊
Liam Draxl is on fire!💪
Cheering for Basilashvili, Nikoloz all the way!📣
Go for it Basilashvili, Nikoloz!
You're losers Liam Draxl 😝
Basilashvili, Nikoloz sucks 🍭
The game's gonna be hot! 🔥
I'm rooting for Liam Draxl
I'm rooting for Basilashvili, Nikoloz
I'm looking forward to an exciting tiebreak
Share your opinion with quick phrases or pass authorization and write your own
Quick comment (without authorization)