Home Page News Predictions Matches Articles Education
Chelsea (Cobalt) [eFootball]
Finished
-
-
Manchester City (Tanner) [eFootball]

Chelsea (Cobalt) [eFootball] - Manchester City (Tanner) [eFootball] betting predictions, odds and match statistics for 17 May 2025

Duel between Chelsea (Cobalt) [eFootball] x Manchester City (Tanner) [eFootball] is looking to be one of those affairs where momentum gets out the window. Starting at , this Valhalla Cup 3 tie has storylines for days.

Chelsea (Cobalt) [eFootball]’s been erratic, their performances yo-yoing from classy to baffling. Meanwhile, Manchester City (Tanner) [eFootball]’s grinding through a slump, their rearguard looking shaky.

Digging into past games, it’s a toss-up. Chelsea (Cobalt) [eFootball]’s enjoyed the advantage lately, but soccer’s got a nonexistent memory.

My two cents: Both sides’ve got issues. Chelsea (Cobalt) [eFootball]’s engine room’s off-rhythm, while Manchester City (Tanner) [eFootball]’s attack needs a cutting edge.

When it comes to the Valhalla Cup 3, this game carries extra weight. The division’s race for continental qualification means every outcome is crucial, and both clubs know a statement win here could change narratives in the rankings. Recent form in the Valhalla Cup 3 suggests neither outfit can afford lapses, making this tie even more compelling.

But hey, there’s a feeling about this one—who knows, it’s the matchup where a player delivers.

Final thought: This ain't just another game—it's unmissable action with ramifications at both ends of the table. Mark your calendars.

Match odds

The odds analysts have assessed the upcoming game between Chelsea (Cobalt) [eFootball] x Manchester City (Tanner) [eFootball] and published their odds on the possible results of the event to be played on .

The probability of Chelsea (Cobalt) [eFootball] winning, according to Leon experts, is 5.8.

Manchester City (Tanner) [eFootball] has a 1.28 the probability of winning the game according to the odds.

The probability of a draw is offered at 5.8.

Will "Chelsea (Cobalt) eFootball" outbattle "Manchester City (Tanner) eFootball"?

"Chelsea (Cobalt) eFootball" has a very low chance of having the victory. The score is based on the meeting statistics and odds of the bookmaker.

Will "Manchester City (Tanner) eFootball" break "Chelsea (Cobalt) eFootball"?

"Manchester City (Tanner) eFootball" has a high chance of gaining the victory. The score is based on the results of previous matches and odds of the bookmaker.

Bets and odds on 1X2 for the match "Chelsea (Cobalt) eFootball" – "Manchester City (Tanner) eFootball"

The odds on "Chelsea (Cobalt) eFootball" winning are 5.8, the odds on "Manchester City (Tanner) eFootball" winning are 1.28, and the odds of a draw are 5.8.

What are the odds on "Chelsea (Cobalt) eFootball" winning?

In the game "Chelsea (Cobalt) eFootball" vs "Manchester City (Tanner) eFootball", which will take place on 17 May 2025, the bookmaker offers the following odds on "Chelsea (Cobalt) eFootball" winning: 5.8.

What are the odds on "Manchester City (Tanner) eFootball" winning?

In the game "Manchester City (Tanner) eFootball" vs "Chelsea (Cobalt) eFootball", which will take place on 17 May 2025, the bookmaker offers the following odds on "Manchester City (Tanner) eFootball" winning: 1.28 .

What are the odds of a draw in the match "Chelsea (Cobalt) eFootball" vs "Manchester City (Tanner) eFootball ?

The odds of a draw in the match "Chelsea (Cobalt) eFootball" vs "Manchester City (Tanner) eFootball", which will take place on 17 May 2025, are currently equal to 5.8.
Quick phrases
Go Chelsea (Cobalt) [eFootball]!✊
Chelsea (Cobalt) [eFootball] is on fire!💪
There'll be a draw
Cheering for Manchester City (Tanner) [eFootball] all the way!📣
Go for it Manchester City (Tanner) [eFootball]!
You're losers Chelsea (Cobalt) [eFootball] 😝
Manchester City (Tanner) [eFootball] sucks 🍭
The game's gonna be hot!🔥
I'm rooting for Chelsea (Cobalt) [eFootball]
I'm rooting for Manchester City (Tanner) [eFootball]
Share your opinion with quick phrases or pass authorization and write your own
Quick comment (without authorization)