Home Page News Predictions Matches Articles Education
Chelsea (kravark) Esports
00
days
00
hours
00
min
00
sec
2
2
1st half
2:2
West Ham (tonexo)
1
2.85
X
5.19
2
1.72

Chelsea (kravark) Esports - West Ham (tonexo) betting predictions, odds and match statistics for 1 July 2025

Encounter between Chelsea (kravark) Esports vs West Ham (tonexo) is looking to be one of those affairs where momentum gets out the window. Starting at , this ESB Volta (2x3 min.) tie has storylines aplenty.

Chelsea (kravark) Esports’s been erratic, their performances swinging from inspired to baffling. Meanwhile, West Ham (tonexo)’s scrapping through a rough patch, their backline looking unstable.

Looking at past games, it’s a crapshoot. Chelsea (kravark) Esports’s taken the advantage lately, but the game’s got a short memory.

For what it’s worth: Each outfits’ve got issues. Chelsea (kravark) Esports’s center park’s sputtering, while West Ham (tonexo)’s forwards needs a spark.

In terms of the ESB Volta (2x3 min.), this game carries added significance. The division’s fight for continental qualification means every result matters, and both teams know a strong showing here could shift momentum in the rankings. How they’ve fared lately in the ESB Volta (2x3 min.) suggests neither side can afford lapses, making this encounter even more unmissable.

Still, there’s a vibe about this one—who knows, it’s the game where a player becomes a hero.

Final thought: This isn't just another game—it's must-watch action with implications at both ends of the table. Mark your calendars.

Betting odds

Odds perspective:

If you’re putting money on this one, here’s the unvarnished truth.

Chelsea (kravark) Esports at 2.85 to win feels slightly short given their inconsistencies in the ESB Volta (2x3 min.) this term. Their xG (expected goals) suggest they’re overperforming — analytics guys would steer clear.

West Ham (tonexo)’s 1.72 line smells value, especially if their center forward (CF) shakes off his recent funk.

The sharp players’ll likely poke at the Draw 5.19 — these big games often play out tight, and occasion can kill attacking flow.

1
2.85
X
5.19
2
1.72
Bet now

Will "Chelsea (kravark) Esports" break "West Ham (tonexo)"?

"Chelsea (kravark) Esports" has a low chance of winning. The score is based on the meeting statistics and odds of the bookmaker.

Will "West Ham (tonexo)" outmuscle "Chelsea (kravark) Esports"?

"West Ham (tonexo)" has a average chance of having the victory. The score is based on the results of recent matches and odds of the bookmaker.

Bets and odds on 1X2 for the match "Chelsea (kravark) Esports" – "West Ham (tonexo)"

The odds on "Chelsea (kravark) Esports" winning are 2.85, the odds on "West Ham (tonexo)" winning are 1.72, and the odds of a draw are 5.19.

What are the odds on "Chelsea (kravark) Esports" winning?

In the game "Chelsea (kravark) Esports" vs "West Ham (tonexo)", which will take place on 1 July 2025, the bookmaker offers the following odds on "Chelsea (kravark) Esports" winning: 2.85.

What are the odds on "West Ham (tonexo)" winning?

In the game "West Ham (tonexo)" vs "Chelsea (kravark) Esports", which will take place on 1 July 2025, the bookmaker offers the following odds on "West Ham (tonexo)" winning: 1.72 .

What are the odds of a draw in the match "Chelsea (kravark) Esports" vs "West Ham (tonexo) ?

The odds of a draw in the match "Chelsea (kravark) Esports" vs "West Ham (tonexo)", which will take place on 1 July 2025, are currently equal to 5.19.
Bet now Chelsea (kravark) Esports — West Ham (tonexo)
Chelsea (kravark) Esports
ESB Volta (2x3 min.)
1
2.85
X
5.19
2
1.72
Bet amount
West Ham (tonexo)
If the bet wins you get
0.00
Bet now
Quick phrases
Go Chelsea (kravark) Esports!✊
Chelsea (kravark) Esports is on fire!💪
There'll be a draw
Cheering for West Ham (tonexo) all the way!📣
Go for it West Ham (tonexo)!
You're losers Chelsea (kravark) Esports 😝
West Ham (tonexo) sucks 🍭
The game's gonna be hot!🔥
I'm rooting for Chelsea (kravark) Esports
I'm rooting for West Ham (tonexo)
Share your opinion with quick phrases or pass authorization and write your own
Quick comment (without authorization)