Home Page News Predictions Matches Articles Education
Manchester City (Cobalt) [eFootball]
Finished
-
-
Chelsea (Tanner) [eFootball]

Manchester City (Cobalt) [eFootball] - Chelsea (Tanner) [eFootball] predictions, statistics and betting tips for 17 May 2025

Fixture between Manchester City (Cobalt) [eFootball] and Chelsea (Tanner) [eFootball] is shaping up to be one of those spectacles where form flies out the window. Underway at , this Valhalla Cup 3 meeting has narratives aplenty.

Manchester City (Cobalt) [eFootball]’s been all over the shop, their performances swinging from brilliant to questionable. Meanwhile, Chelsea (Tanner) [eFootball]’s fighting through a rough patch, their defense looking unstable.

Looking at past meetings, it’s a crapshoot. Manchester City (Cobalt) [eFootball]’s taken the upper hand lately, but footy’s got a short memory.

Personal take: Both teams’ve got holes. Manchester City (Cobalt) [eFootball]’s center park’s off-rhythm, while Chelsea (Tanner) [eFootball]’s frontline craves a cutting edge.

When it comes to the Valhalla Cup 3, this game carries greater importance. The league’s fight for European places means every outcome is crucial, and both sides know a statement win here could alter trajectories in the standings. Current performances in the Valhalla Cup 3 suggests neither outfit can afford slip-ups, making this contest even more unmissable.

That said, there’s a vibe about this one—perhaps, it’s the game where somebody becomes a hero.

Bottom line: This ain't just another fixture—it's unmissable action with ramifications at both ends of the table. Mark your calendars.

Betting odds

Are you planning to bet on the upcoming game between Manchester City (Cobalt) [eFootball] x Chelsea (Tanner) [eFootball]?

The chance of Manchester City (Cobalt) [eFootball] winning, according to betting experts, is 5.8.

Chelsea (Tanner) [eFootball] has a 1.32 the possibility of winning the game according to the odds.

The chance of a draw is offered at 5.3.

Will "Manchester City (Cobalt) eFootball" outbattle "Chelsea (Tanner) eFootball"?

"Manchester City (Cobalt) eFootball" has a very low chance of winning the victory. The score is based on the results of previous matches and odds of the bookmaker.

Will "Chelsea (Tanner) eFootball" beat "Manchester City (Cobalt) eFootball"?

"Chelsea (Tanner) eFootball" has a high chance of having the victory. The score is based on the results of recent matches and odds of the bookmaker.

Bets and odds on 1X2 for the match "Manchester City (Cobalt) eFootball" – "Chelsea (Tanner) eFootball"

The odds on "Manchester City (Cobalt) eFootball" winning are 5.8, the odds on "Chelsea (Tanner) eFootball" winning are 1.32, and the odds of a draw are 5.3.

What are the odds on "Manchester City (Cobalt) eFootball" winning?

In the game "Manchester City (Cobalt) eFootball" vs "Chelsea (Tanner) eFootball", which will take place on 17 May 2025, the bookmaker offers the following odds on "Manchester City (Cobalt) eFootball" winning: 5.8.

What are the odds on "Chelsea (Tanner) eFootball" winning?

In the game "Chelsea (Tanner) eFootball" vs "Manchester City (Cobalt) eFootball", which will take place on 17 May 2025, the bookmaker offers the following odds on "Chelsea (Tanner) eFootball" winning: 1.32 .

What are the odds of a draw in the match "Manchester City (Cobalt) eFootball" vs "Chelsea (Tanner) eFootball ?

The odds of a draw in the match "Manchester City (Cobalt) eFootball" vs "Chelsea (Tanner) eFootball", which will take place on 17 May 2025, are currently equal to 5.3.
Quick phrases
Go Manchester City (Cobalt) [eFootball]!✊
Manchester City (Cobalt) [eFootball] is on fire!💪
There'll be a draw
Cheering for Chelsea (Tanner) [eFootball] all the way!📣
Go for it Chelsea (Tanner) [eFootball]!
You're losers Manchester City (Cobalt) [eFootball] 😝
Chelsea (Tanner) [eFootball] sucks 🍭
The game's gonna be hot!🔥
I'm rooting for Manchester City (Cobalt) [eFootball]
I'm rooting for Chelsea (Tanner) [eFootball]
Share your opinion with quick phrases or pass authorization and write your own
Quick comment (without authorization)