Home Page News Predictions Matches Articles Education
Kozlov, S
Finished
2
0
Ponwith, Nathan
Kozlov, S
L
L
W
W
L
ATP Acapulco
22.02.26
Patrick Kypson
2–0
Stefan Kozlov
ATP Challenger Metepec, Mexico Men Singles
20.02.26
Stefan Kozlov
0–2
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
ATP Challenger Metepec, Mexico Men Singles
18.02.26
Stefan Kozlov
2–0
Karl Poling
ATP Challenger Metepec, Mexico Men Singles
16.02.26
Stefan Kozlov
2–1
Tristan Mccormick
Challenger Cleveland
06.02.26
Stefan Kozlov
0–2
Keegan Smith
Ponwith, Nathan
L
W
L
W
W
ITF Costa Rica M25 San Jose
18.02.26
Nathan Ponwith
1–2
Robert Strombachs
ITF Costa Rica M25 San Jose
17.02.26
Niccolo Catini
1–2
Nathan Ponwith
ITF Mexico M15 Huamantla 2
06.02.26
Nathan Ponwith
0–2
Natan Rodrigues
ITF Mexico M15 Huamantla 2
05.02.26
Gage Brymer
1–2
Nathan Ponwith
ITF M15 Huamantla 2 (Mexico), Men Singles
03.02.26
Nathan Ponwith
2–0
Erazo Rodriguez, Camilo

Over the last games Kozlov, S holds victories - 2, losses - 3. Ponwith, Nathan on the other hand ends the latest games with victories - 3, losses - 2. Based on this data we can assume that Ponwith, Nathan at the moment is in better form, in comparison to Kozlov, S.

Kozlov, S: Patrick Kypson – (Loss 2:0), Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez – (Loss 0:2), Karl Poling – (Win 2:0), Tristan Mccormick – (Win 2:1), Keegan Smith – (Loss 0:2).

Ponwith, Nathan: Robert Strombachs – (Loss 1:2), Niccolo Catini – (Win 1:2), Natan Rodrigues – (Loss 0:2), Gage Brymer – (Win 1:2), Erazo Rodriguez, Camilo – (Win 2:0).

Both opponents have moved to the qualification_round_1 while defeating admirable opponents on their way there. In tournaments as USA, Phoenix, Hard every match is meaningful which is why a great matchup awaits us.

Quick phrases
Go Kozlov, S!✊
Kozlov, S is on fire!💪
Cheering for Ponwith, Nathan all the way!📣
Go for it Ponwith, Nathan!
You're losers Kozlov, S 😝
Ponwith, Nathan sucks 🍭
The game's gonna be hot! 🔥
I'm rooting for Kozlov, S
I'm rooting for Ponwith, Nathan
I'm looking forward to an exciting tiebreak
Share your opinion with quick phrases or pass authorization and write your own
Quick comment (without authorization)