Home Page News Predictions Matches Articles Education
Nathan Pitts
Finished
0
2
Gallagher, Gordon
Clemson
P
GF
Pts
1
Joaquin Benoit
1
-
2
Pitts, Nathan
1
-
3
Gallagher, Gordon
1
-
4
Kemp, Harrison
0
-
5
Ivan Yatsuk
1
-
Nathan Pitts
W
L
W
W
L
UTR PTT Clemson Men 01
21.04.26
Pitts, Nathan
2–0
Ivan Yatsuk
UTR PTT Knoxville Men 05
14.12.25
Lucas Perez
2–1
Pitts, Nathan
UTR PTT Knoxville Men 05
13.12.25
Robinson, Chase
1–2
Pitts, Nathan
UTR PTT Knoxville Men 05
11.12.25
Daugis, Antanas
1–2
Pitts, Nathan
UTR PTT Knoxville Men 05
10.12.25
Pitts, Nathan
0–2
Roussel, Felix
Gallagher, Gordon
L
L
L
W
L
UTR PTT Clemson Men 01
21.04.26
Joaquin Benoit
2–0
Gallagher, Gordon
Challenger Savannah
19.04.26
Gallagher, Gordon
0–2
Raphael Perot
UTR Boca Raton M03
28.03.26
Antonin Chapuis
2–0
Gallagher, Gordon
UTR Boca Raton M03
27.03.26
Gallagher, Gordon
2–1
Singh, Gurjot
UTR Boca Raton M03
25.03.26
Gallagher, Gordon
1–2
Kahatapitiya, Romesh

Over the last games Nathan Pitts holds wins - 3, losses - 2. Gallagher, Gordon on the other hand holds the following results from the latest games: wins - 1, losses - 4. Based on the games played we can assume that Nathan Pitts at the moment is in better form, in comparison to Gallagher, Gordon.

Nathan Pitts: Ivan Yatsuk – (Win 2:0), Lucas Perez – (Loss 2:1), Robinson, Chase – (Win 1:2), Daugis, Antanas – (Win 1:2), Roussel, Felix – (Loss 0:2).

Gallagher, Gordon: Joaquin Benoit – (Loss 2:0), Raphael Perot – (Loss 0:2), Antonin Chapuis – (Loss 2:0), Singh, Gurjot – (Win 2:1), Kahatapitiya, Romesh – (Loss 1:2).

Nathan Pitts takes 1st place in the tournament table. Gallagher, Gordon holds 3rd place .

Quick phrases
Go Nathan Pitts!✊
Nathan Pitts is on fire!💪
Cheering for Gallagher, Gordon all the way!📣
Go for it Gallagher, Gordon!
You're losers Nathan Pitts 😝
Gallagher, Gordon sucks 🍭
The game's gonna be hot! 🔥
I'm rooting for Nathan Pitts
I'm rooting for Gallagher, Gordon
I'm looking forward to an exciting tiebreak
Share your opinion with quick phrases or pass authorization and write your own
Quick comment (without authorization)